An outline of the universal law formation of the categorical imperative as a method for determining

This formula is a two part test. First, one creates a maxim and considers whether the maxim could be a universal law for all rational beings. Second, one determines whether rational beings would will it to be a universal law. Once it is clear that the maxim passes both prongs of the test, there are no exceptions.

An outline of the universal law formation of the categorical imperative as a method for determining

This formula is a two part test. First, one creates a maxim and considers whether the maxim could be a universal law for all rational beings. Second, one determines whether rational beings would will it to be a universal law.

Once it is clear that the maxim passes both prongs of the test, there are no exceptions. As a paramedic faced with a distraught widow who asks whether her late husband suffered in his accidental death, you must decide which maxim to create and based on the test which action to perform.

Consequently, according to Kant, M1 is a moral action.

Categorical Imperative essay topic, research and writing

The initial stage of the Universal Law Formation of the Categorical Imperative requires that a maxim be universally applicable to all rational beings. M1 succeeds in passing the first stage. We can easily imagine a world in which paramedics always answer widows truthfully when queried.

Therefore, this maxim is logical and everyone can abide by it without causing a logical impossibility. The next logical step is to apply the second stage of the test. The second requirement is that a rational being would will this maxim to become a universal law. In testing this part, you must decide whether in every case, a rational being would believe that the morally correct action is to tell the truth.

First, it is clear that the widow expects to know the truth.

An outline of the universal law formation of the categorical imperative as a method for determining

A lie would only serve to spare her feelings if she believed it to be the truth. Therefore, even people who would consider lying to her, must concede that the correct and expected action is to tell the truth.

By asking she has already decided, good or bad, that she must know the truth. What if telling the truth brings the widow to the point where she commits suicide, however?

Is telling her the truth then a moral action although its consequence is this terrible response? If telling the widow the truth drives her to commit suicide, it seems like no rational being would will the maxim to become a universal law.

The suicide is, however, a consequence of your initial action. The suicide has no bearing, at least for the Categorical Imperative, on whether telling the truth is moral or not.

Why choose us?

Likewise it is impossible to judge whether upon hearing the news, the widow would commit suicide. Granted it is a possibility, but there are a multitude of alternative choices that she could make and it is impossible to predict each one. To decide whether rational being would will a maxim to become a law, the maxim itself must be examined rationally and not its consequences.

Accordingly, the maxim passes the second test. Conversely, some people might argue that in telling the widow a lie, you spare her years of torment and suffering. Certainly, a universal law that prevents the feelings of people who are already in pain from being hurt further seems like an excellent universal law.

[BINGSNIPMIX-3

Unfortunately for this line of objection, the only reason a lie works is because the person being lied to believes it to be the truth.Kant’s Categorical Imperative: Summary & Kantian philosophy outlines the Universal Law Formation of the Categorical Imperative as a method for determining morality of actions.

This formula is a two part test. First, one creates a maxim and considers whether the maxim could be a .

We can write ANY essay exclusively for you and make you proud of the result!

Hence a categorical imperative expresses only the very form of a universally binding law: “nothing is left but the conformity of actions as such with universal law” ().

To act morally, then, is to form one’s intentions on the basis of the very idea of a universal principle of action. Kant: the Universal Law Formation of the Categorical Imperative Kantian philosophy outlines the Universal Law Formation of the Categorical Imperative as a method for determining morality of actions.

This formula is a two part test. Imperative Kantian philosophy outlines the Universal Law Formation of the Categorical Imperative as a method for determining morality of actions.

This formula is a two part test. First, one creates a maxim and considers whether the maxim could be a universal law for all rational beings. Kant's Categorical Imperative - Free download as Word Doc .doc /.docx), PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online for free.

Scribd es red social de lectura y publicación más importante del mundo. Kantian philosophy outlines the Universal Law Formation of the Categorical Imperative as a method for determining morality 4/4(1).

Kant's Categorical Imperative: Summary & Analysis - SchoolWorkHelper