An analysis of the law and morality behind a justifiable murder

Posted on June 10, by cgsbbusiness I hate to question spot but… Critical analysis of murder and voluntary manslaughter has not come up for the last three exams — since Jan Is it time for it this year?

An analysis of the law and morality behind a justifiable murder

Inthe United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which is a pledge among nations to promote fundamental rights as the foundation of freedom, justice, and peace in the world.

The political elite in Europe often condemn the US as human rights violators since we still use the death penalty on murderers, which they insist is a violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

[BINGSNIPMIX-3

But they couldn't be more wrong. Abolitionists interpret from Article 3 in that Declaration to proclaim each person's right to protection from deprivation of life, especially murderers!

And they also point to Article 5, which states that no one shall be subjected to cruel or degrading punishment. From this, abolitinists self-righteously declare that the death penalty violates both of these rights.

But in fact, nowhere in that declaration is the DP specifically condemned as a human rights violation! For instance, in Article 3 it states: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. Strangely, from this, abolitionists interpret that the death penalty is a human rights violation since it deprives a person's right to life.

But if we were to follow that reasoning, we would have to abolish prisons as a human rights violation as well since they deprive people of liberty. We would also have to abolish charging taxes and fines since they violate one's "security of person. So the interpretation that abolitionists derive from Article 3 of the Declaration is illogical and contradictory.

And in Article 5, it states: No one shall be subjected to cruel or degrading punishment. From this, abolitionists insist that capital punishment is ruled out because it is "the ultimate cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment.

Indeed, what is stated in Article 5 is highly subjective and open to interpretation and could just as easily be applied to prisons as well. And at the time it was implemented, most nations who signed it had the had the death penalty and continued to use it long after the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was approved by them.

An analysis of the law and morality behind a justifiable murder

So obviously, the signers back then had the moral coherence to appreciate the distinction between murders and executions. What the DP is, is a punishment for a human rights violation, not a human rights violation itself. Anyone with any amount of moral judgment and coherence would recognize and respect that difference.

All abolitionists are trying to do is protect human rights violators at the expense of their victims by trying to pass off the just punishment of human rights violations as a human rights violation itself, an analysis that one would have to be totally lacking in sound moral judgement to accept since it is so obviously contradictory as well as morally and logically skewed.

European elites enjoy showcasing their opposition to the death penalty as a progressive policy based on the respect of human rights. However, the moral basis of European opposition to the death penalty is riddled with contradictions, especially when viewed in the context of Europe's progressive euthanasia policies or dismal record on human rights on their own continent reference their indifference to the Balkans.

Such large contradictions usually suggest there are other motives. Germany, along with France, has long led the anti-death penalty charge in Europe.

An analysis of the law and morality behind a justifiable murder

The mayor of Paris took this viewpoint to such an extreme position that he named a city street after convicted American cop killer Mumia Abu-Jamal. So it came as little surprise when a Washington Post article revealed on June 4, that the true basis for Germany's strong anti-death penalty policy was not based on morals or a sense of humanity.

Instead, it was based on protecting convicted Nazi war criminals: Contrasting their nation's policy with that of the Americans, Germans point proudly to Article of their Basic Law, adopted in Communist East Germany kept the death penalty until But the actual history of the German death penalty ban casts this claim in a different light.

Article was in fact the brainchild of a right-wing politician who sympathized with convicted Nazi war criminals -- and sought to prevent their execution by British and American occupation authorities. Far from intending to repudiate the barbarism of Hitler, the author of Article wanted to make a statement about the supposed excesses of Allied victors' justice.

According to Interpol and the FBI this is not necessarily the case.

Capital Punishment in the United States

If one excludes murders committed by inner city blacks from the statistics the United States actually has a lower murder rate then Germany and France. That is not to imply that blacks are inherently evil. Their murder rates have more to do with welfare policies, racial separatism, etc.

Most blacks are decent people, but a sizeable minority of them commits a disproportionate amount of crimes.As a follow-up to Tuesday’s post about the majority-minority public schools in Oslo, the following brief account reports the latest statistics on the cultural enrichment of schools in Austria.

Vienna is the most fully enriched location, and seems to be in roughly the same situation as Oslo. Many thanks to Hermes for the translation from arteensevilla.com Is killing ever justifiable? Why or why not?

Latest breaking news, including politics, crime and celebrity. Find stories, updates and expert opinion. NOTES * PRELIMINARY NOTE. The topic “In Search of a Universal Ethic: A New Look at the Natural Law” was submitted to the study of the International Theological Commission To undertake this study a Subcommittee was formed, composed of Archbishop Roland Minnerath, the Reverend Professors: P Serge-Thomas Bonino OP (Chairman of the Subcommittee), Geraldo Luis Borges Hackmann, Pierre . The Zimbabwe Electronic Law Journal Commentary on Contemporary Legal Issues The Editorial Board of this new electronic journal comprises: Dr T. Mutangi, Professor L. Madhuku and Dr. I. Maja (co-Chief editors) and Professors J. Stewart and G. Feltoe.

Update Cancel. Answer Wiki. 32 Answers. and as such morality and the law developed hand in hand for as long as people had laws and morals. It used to be that cannibalism and pedophillic acts were as normal as baking bread and quite accepted, or at least, ignored.

Is murder ever justifiable. JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit organization helping the academic community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly record and to advance research and teaching in sustainable ways.

Just War Theory. Just war theory deals with the justification of how and why wars are fought. The justification can be either theoretical or historical.

ENTERTAINMENT, POLITICS, AND THE SOUL: LESSONS OF THE ROMAN GAMES (PART TWO) PART ONE. Introduction. The Ludi and the Munera: Public and Private Games.

Justifiable homicides in Florida have tripled, according to Florida Department of Law Enforcement data. Other states have seen similar increases, FBI statistics show.

Principles for Passion Killing: An Evolutionary Solution to Manslaughter Mitigation